Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(11)2022 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36366361

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the attitudes and practices of Brazilian adults regarding the mandatory COVID-19 vaccination and their hesitancy towards the vaccination of children. METHODS: Between March and May 2022, Brazilian adults answered an online questionnaire distributed through social media. The SAGE-WG questionnaire was adapted to measure hesitancy to the vaccination of children. RESULTS: Of the 1007 participants, 67.4% believed that adult COVID-19 vaccination should be mandatory. Just over half of the participants (51.5%) believed that parents and/or guardians should decide if their children should be vaccinated against COVID-19 or not and 9.1% were unsure. Individuals who were younger, non-religious and had higher awareness of COVID-19 risks and critics of the federal government's performance in combating the pandemic were more likely to agree with mandatory adult vaccination. However, less agreement among parents and/or guardians concerning children's vaccination was observed, with lower scores for hesitancy to the vaccination of children. CONCLUSION: In Brazil, there is still far from a consensus on mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for adults and a significant proportion of the population believes that parents and/or guardians should be free to decide on their children's vaccination. These views are associated with age, religion, knowledge of COVID-19 risks and political inclination.

2.
Nursing (Ed. bras., Impr.) ; 24(279): 6053-6062, ago.-2021.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1343581

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: apresentar as evidências científicas sobre a atuação da(o) enfermeira(o) na classificação de risco em obstetrícia. Método: trata-se de um estudo qualitativo, do tipo revisão integrativa, realizado nas bases de dados SciELO e PubMed, na série temporal de 2011 a 2021, no idioma português, com os descritores e operadores boleanos. Resultados: Identificou-se um conjunto de 105 publicações sobre a temática no SciELO e 86 na PubMed. Do total de 191 publicações identificadas, segundo a combinação dos descritores e acréscimos de booleanos, 4 foram consideradas para análise, que demonstravam a(o) enfermeira(o) como principal profissional na classificação de risco às gestantes devido à sua assistência eficaz, ágil e resolutiva, reduzindo os riscos à saúde do binômio e impactando sobre a mortalidade materno-infantil. Conclusão: percebe-se que a utilização da Classificação de Risco às gestantes e à sua realização pela Enfermagem, proporciona melhorias no serviço, promovendo eficácia no atendimento as urgências e emergências obstétricas.(AU)


Objective: to present the scientific evidence on the role of the nurse in the classification of risk in obstetrics. Method: this is a qualitative study, integrative review type, carried out in the SciELO and PubMed databases, in the time series from 2011 to 2021, in Portuguese, with Boolean descriptors and operators. Results: A set of 105 publications on the subject in SciELO and 86 in PubMed were identified. Of the 191 publications identified, according to the combination of descriptors and additions of Booleans, 4 were considered for analysis, which showed the nurse as the main professional in the risk classification of pregnant women due to their effective, agile and resolution, reducing the health risks of the binomial and impacting on maternal and child mortality. Conclusion: it is noticed that the use of the Risk Classification for pregnant women and its performance by Nursing, provides improvements in the service, promoting effectiveness in attending obstetric urgencies and emergencies.(AU)


Objetivo: presentar la evidencia científica sobre el rol de la enfermera en la clasificación de riesgo en obstetricia. Método: se trata de un estudio cualitativo, de tipo revisión integradora, realizado en las bases de datos SciELO y PubMed, en la serie temporal de 2011 a 2021, en portugués, con descriptores y operadores booleanos. Resultados: Se identificó un conjunto de 105 publicaciones sobre el tema en SciELO y 86 en PubMed. De las 191 publicaciones identificadas, de acuerdo a la combinación de descriptores y adiciones de booleanos, se consideraron para análisis 4, que mostraron al enfermero como el principal profesional en la clasificación de riesgo de la gestante por su eficacia, agilidad y resolución, reduciendo la salud. riesgos del binomio y que impactan en la mortalidad materna e infantil. Conclusión: se advierte que el uso de la Clasificación de Riesgo para gestantes y su desempeño por parte de Enfermería, brinda mejoras en el servicio, promoviendo la efectividad en la atención de urgencias y emergencias obstétricas.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Delivery, Obstetric , Nurses , Obstetric Nursing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...